Getting a tattoo is not automatically a sin. Leviticus 19:28 forbade tattoo marks for ancient Israel, but the New Testament gives no tattoo-specific ban.
A tattoo's meaning, motive, risks, and effect on your conscience still matter.
On this page
- 01The one Bible verse that names tattoo marks
- 02Does Leviticus 19:28 apply to Christians today?
- 03Five questions to ask before getting a tattoo
- 04Does "your body is a temple" settle the question?
- 05Christian tattoos, memorial tattoos, and tattoos you already have
- 06Why faithful Christians reach different conclusions
- 07So, is it a sin to get a tattoo?

The one Bible verse that names tattoo marks
Leviticus 19:28 says, "You shall not make any cuts on your body for the dead or tattoo yourselves: I am the Lord." It is the only biblical verse that directly names tattoo marks.
The command was given to Israel as part of a chapter about living as God's holy people. Its first half clearly mentions cutting the body "for the dead." Nearby verses also warn against divination, pagan mourning customs, and seeking mediums. That context is why many interpreters connect the verse with practices by which Israel's neighbors mourned the dead or marked religious allegiance.1
The context does not make the last phrase disappear. God really did tell ancient Israel not to put tattoo marks on themselves. The debated question is narrower: does that covenant command function as a direct rule for Christians today, and does it describe the same thing as a modern decorative tattoo?
Does Leviticus 19:28 apply to Christians today?
Christians agree that Leviticus is Scripture. They do not agree that every command given to Israel applies to the church in the same way. The same chapter regulates mixed fabrics, the edges of beards, and when fruit may be eaten. The New Testament's instructions to Gentile believers in Acts 15 do not repeat a ban on tattoos. Our guide to the Ten Commandments explains why Christians also distinguish the Decalogue from other commands in the law.
That does not prove that any tattoo is acceptable. It does explain why many Catholic and Protestant teachers conclude that Leviticus 19:28 is not a tattoo-specific law binding Christians under the new covenant. A modern tattoo is not automatically the ancient mourning or religious practice the verse confronted.2
Other Christians take the command more strictly. They see it as an enduring warning against deliberately marking the body God made, even if the surrounding culture and purpose have changed. A believer who is persuaded of that reading should not violate conscience just because another Christian feels free to get a tattoo.
Leviticus does not have nothing to do with Christians, but this verse does not settle every modern case by itself. It shapes the question. Applying it still requires Christian judgment.
Five questions to ask before getting a tattoo
The lack of a simple rule does not mean anything goes. Paul asks whether a choice is helpful, whether it builds others up, and whether it can be done to the glory of God (1 Corinthians 10:23-31). These five questions make those principles practical.
- What does it mean? A design that celebrates cruelty, sexual exploitation, hatred, the occult, or contempt for God is not rescued by calling it art. Check unfamiliar words and symbols before making them permanent.
- Why do I want it? Honest motives can include remembrance, beauty, culture, or gratitude. Motives such as rebellion, humiliation of someone else, impulsive attention-seeking, or a desire to injure yourself deserve a pause, not a rationalization.
- Can I do it with a clear conscience? Romans 14:23 warns against acting while condemning yourself. Conscience needs to be informed by Scripture and wise counsel, not treated as an infallible feeling. But pushing past a serious conviction is not faith.
- Am I practicing stewardship? A tattoo is permanent, costs money, breaks the skin, and may be difficult to remove. Wisdom asks whether the studio follows local health rules and hygienic practices, what ink is used, how healing works, where the tattoo will sit, and whether you can responsibly absorb the cost.
- How will it affect people entrusted to me? Love considers a spouse, children, church community, employer, or people vulnerable to your example. That does not give every critic control over your body. It does mean Christian freedom is never only about proving that you are allowed.
Does "your body is a temple" settle the question?
First Corinthians 6:19-20 is often quoted as if Paul were discussing tattoos: "your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit" and believers should glorify God in their bodies. But the passage is addressing sexual immorality and union with Christ, not body art.
The verse still rules out treating the body as worthless. It supports a broader call to stewardship. It does not, by itself, prove that every permanent change to the body is sinful. Christians accept many changes to the body for healing, adornment, or ordinary care; each choice has to be evaluated honestly rather than smuggled into a verse about something else.
Stewardship also includes real health risks. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration warns that contaminated ink or unsafe practices can cause infection, and that allergic reactions, scarring, and difficult removal are possible.3 Choose a reputable studio that follows local health rules and hygienic practices, and do not rush the decision. These risks do not turn every tattoo into a sin.
Christian tattoos, memorial tattoos, and tattoos you already have
A cross, Bible verse, or other Christian symbol is not automatically a good tattoo. A verse can be misquoted. A sacred image can be chosen carelessly or placed where it predictably becomes a joke. The same five questions still apply. A Christian design may express faith, but it is not a permission slip that makes motive and wisdom irrelevant.
A memorial tattoo is not automatically the kind of cutting "for the dead" named in Leviticus 19:28. Modern remembrance and ancient ritual marking are not necessarily the same act. Grief can still make people act quickly, so waiting until the first shock has passed is often wise before making a permanent decision.
If you already have tattoos, Scripture gives no general command to remove them after becoming a Christian. Ink does not keep a person from Christ, cancel baptism, or make someone less welcome in the church. If a design now celebrates something you have renounced, you can consider covering or removing it, but that is a pastoral and practical decision rather than a condition of forgiveness.
Tattoo removal has its own expense and risk of scarring. Do not let shame rush you into another bodily procedure. Talk with a mature pastor or priest and a qualified medical professional when the design or removal question is serious.
Why faithful Christians reach different conclusions
Some Christians abstain because they believe Leviticus 19:28 expresses an enduring prohibition or because tattoos carry associations they cannot embrace. Others believe the verse addressed Israel's covenant identity and ancient practices, leaving modern tattoos to be judged by their content, purpose, and circumstances. Both positions are trying to take Christian obedience seriously.
The Catholic Catechism does not name tattoos as such. Its broader moral framework calls people to form conscience, choose with prudence, respect bodily dignity, and consider intention and circumstances.4 That means "Catholics may get tattoos" is not the same as saying every tattoo is morally harmless. The content, motive, degree of harm, and other circumstances still matter.
Protestant churches and Orthodox pastors may give different counsel because there is no single tattoo ruling shared across all of Christianity. If your church teaches a stricter position, ask for the biblical reasoning and listen fairly before deciding. A conversation is better than hiding the appointment or using Christian freedom as a weapon.
So, is it a sin to get a tattoo?
Not inherently. The Bible records a real prohibition for ancient Israel, but it does not directly label every modern tattoo a sin for Christians. That distinction also matters when reading broader lists of sins in the Bible: a modern application question still needs careful reasoning. A particular tattoo can be sinful when its message honors evil, its motive is corrupt, it violates conscience, or it involves reckless harm and disregard for people you are responsible to love.
If you cannot make the decision openly before God, wait. Permanence removes any need to hurry. Read Leviticus 19 in full, sit with Romans 14 and 1 Corinthians 10, ask someone spiritually mature who will neither shame nor flatter you, and make the choice in faith rather than pressure.
If the tattoo is already there, you do not need bare skin before you can come to Christ. What matters now is whether your life, including the body and story you carry, is being offered to him.
Frequently asked questions
Are tattoos a sin in Christianity?
Christianity has no universally shared rule that every tattoo is sinful. Leviticus 19:28 prohibited tattoo marks for ancient Israel, while the New Testament gives no tattoo-specific ban. Christians differ over how directly the Leviticus command applies today. A Christian still has to consider a tattoo's meaning, motive, risks, and effect on conscience and others.
Can Christians get tattoos?
Many Christians believe they can get tattoos, provided the design does not honor evil, the motive is honest, the choice does not violate conscience, and the health and relational consequences are considered. Other Christians abstain because they understand Leviticus 19:28 more strictly.
Is a cross or Bible verse tattoo a sin?
A Christian design is not automatically sinful, but religious content does not remove the need for wisdom. Check the quotation and symbol, examine your motive, consider placement and permanence, and do not proceed if you cannot do it with a clear conscience before God.
Is getting a tattoo a mortal sin?
The Catholic Catechism does not classify tattoos as such or say that getting one is automatically a mortal sin. Catholic moral evaluation considers what is chosen, why it is chosen, the circumstances, the harm involved, and whether the conditions for mortal sin are present. A specific tattoo could involve serious sin without every tattoo doing so.
Do I need to remove tattoos after becoming a Christian?
The New Testament gives no general command to remove tattoos after conversion. If a design celebrates something you have renounced, covering or removal may be worth discussing with a pastor or priest, but it is not a condition of Christ's forgiveness or membership in the church.
Does Revelation 19:16 say Jesus had a tattoo?
No. Revelation 19:16 says a royal title is written on Christ's robe and thigh, but the passage is apocalyptic imagery and does not say he received a tattoo. It should not be used as proof either for or against modern tattoos.
References
- Leviticus 19:26-31 places the tattoo-mark command beside prohibitions concerning cuts for the dead, divination, and mediums. Historical explanations differ on how closely the tattoo phrase is tied to ancient mourning or pagan worship. See Biblical Archaeology Society, "What Does the Bible Say About Tattoos?". ↩
- Wayne Grudem argues that Leviticus 19:28 belongs to Mosaic-covenant physical-purity laws and is not a direct new-covenant prohibition, while still treating wisdom as a separate question. See Crossway, "Are Christians Prohibited from Getting Tattoos?" (September 25, 2024). This is one Protestant interpretation, not a statement of universal Christian consensus. ↩
- The U.S. Food and Drug Administration describes tattoos as permanent and identifies possible infection, allergic reaction, scarring, and removal complications. See FDA, "Think Before You Ink: Tattoo Safety". ↩
- The Catechism of the Catholic Church says moral evaluation considers the chosen object, intention, and circumstances (§§1750-1756), discusses the judgment and formation of conscience (§§1776-1802), and calls physical health a gift to be cared for reasonably (§§2288-2289). It does not provide a tattoo-specific rule. ↩
